 |
| George Washington. Via Cornell University Library archives. |
The following is an excerpt from John Fischer's essay "Conversation at Midnight." It appears in the
Treasury of American Writers, an anthology of pieces selected from
Harper's Magazine (not to be confused with the fashion periodical Harper's Bazaar). The article is an account of an evening Fischer spent with an Austrian friar named Father Florian, who has a few theories on America and its foreign policy:
"The trouble with you Americans . . . " he said.
"Look," I [Fischer] interrupted, ". . . for the last month these people have been telling me what is wrong with Americans, and I am beginning to get the idea. We are a bunch of crude materialists. We've got no culture, no respect for tradition, no sense of history, no ideals, no palate . . ."
"Nonsense," Father Florian said. "It is true that most Europeans believe those legends, but I am going to tell you what is
really wrong with America. I traveled back and forth across your country for seven years, making a serious study of the American soul . . . the real trouble is that you are a bunch of dreamy poets. You are besotted with culture. You spend more time and money on it than you can afford. Idealism is a fine thing, but you Americans have carried it too far - to the point where you can no longer bear to face a hard, material fact when you meet one. This is dangerous. You have to learn to be practical, or you will perish.
"Your [foreign] policies - if I may use the word loosely - never seem to mesh. Your President, Vice President, and Secretary of State sometimes issue three contradictory statements on three successive days. Any blabber-mouthed Congressman, general, or
Faubus can destroy months of patient diplomatic effort in a single hour, and often does.
"You do have a few competent diplomats . . . but for some reason (which no foreigner can possibly understand) you refuse to use them . . . What you do use is a herd of amateurs . . . You wouldn't dream of asking them to play first base for the Yankees, or to fix your carburetor, or to fill your teeth. For these jobs you insist on professionals. Yet when your survival as a nation is at issue, you call in any stray millionaire who happened to contribute to the right campaign fund."
With considerable difficulty, I [Fischer] managed to interrupt. Only millionaires, I pointed out, could afford to accept appointment to a major Embassy. By ancient tradition the United States does not pay its Foreign Service professionals enough to cover the running costs of such a post.
"Thank you," he [Father Florian] said, "for reminding me of another American habit which has always baffled me. Why are you always unwilling to pay for what you need most? . . . You offer teachers less than truck drivers, and then you wonder why you have 135,000 classroom jobs unfilled. I have even heard . . . that some of your universities will
pay more for a football coach than for
a physics professor.
"With my own eyes, however, I have seen how you go out of your way to make your scholars feel disreputable. You ridicule them in TV shows and comic strips. Your politicians harass them. Their own pupils treat them with disrespect . . . this is where your impracticality shows up in its most embarrassing form. In other aspects of life you often behave with good sense; if a carpet sweeper or an adding machine breaks down, you get a new one. But when a foreign policy doesn't work, you cling to it all the tighter - out of sheer sentimentality, I suppose."
* * *
 |
| The United States Treasury Building, circa 1919. Via the Smithsonian Institution archives. |
That article appeared in the January 1958 issue of Harper's, and is considerably longer than the paragraphs I've quoted here. Having traveled in Europe for nearly eight months now (not counting my four months of study in France during the fall of 2005), I have, over and over again, heard similar opinions regarding American foreign policy. None were quite so eloquent, and certainly none had ever spent quite as much time in the United States as Father Florian had, but most Europeans are baffled by what occurred during the Bush years, and what continues to occur under Obama.
From our couchsurfing hosts and from people we meet at performances or even during simple street encounters, I am regularly questioned as to how and why Bush was elected for a second term. Bush is regarded here as something approximating a "tyrant king."* (To wit: in Hamburg, Germany, we learned a game in which the faces and statistics of well-known international dictators were pictured on each card. The only American to make an appearance was George W. Bush.) People seem more favorable to Obama, though when asked to expound upon their position, they are not sure why. They are often surprised when we relate that many of the institutions and regulations set in place during the Bush years are used and supported by the Obama administration (such as indefinite detention, extraordinary rendition, domestic wire tapping, and of course, more widely known ones such as the Patriot Act and Guantanamo Bay).
Personally, I choose not to share my personal political opinions - on the internet, at least. But I do think that as a writer of a travel blog, these global opinions might be of some interest to readers. I hope that you agree.
Travelers: have you engaged in political discussions while abroad?
What are some common themes that you've encountered?
For readers who haven't traveled abroad, do you think the excerpt above is an accurate assessment of American foreign policy?
*Note: "Tyrant king" are the exact words used by a Belgian citizen we had a political discussion with - as mentioned above, I am choosing not to share my political opinions in this post, which I am regarding more as a simple journalistic reportage of the things I've heard and seen, and not as a forum for my personal viewpoints.